Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Doing what's necessary, not what's always been done
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Body Language
Saturday, October 9, 2010
What are they thinking?
Monday, September 27, 2010
Who are you competing against?
Friday, August 6, 2010
Listen, Observe, and Engage
The value of communications
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Not all repetition is bad
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The status and the individual
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
What should you do to be successful?
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Courage
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
There is always time to achieve your goals
Thursday, April 29, 2010
It's All In the Small Changes
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Working in the Zone
I've been reading a self-help book that has a pretty cool exercise you can do to gauge where you are in your life, to determine if you are balanced. Thinking this over for the last few weeks, it suddenly dawned on me that this exercise is perfect to help a marketing department determine whether they are on track with their objectives.
First, make a list of your identities/roles within the company and within your customer’s lives. For me this would include two sets of identities as I deal with both internal and external customers. For both sets of customers I would list: trainer, consultant, documentation specialist, and public relations specialist. Take these roles or identities and place them on the graph that you have created (example below), basing the placement upon how you feel that you or your department has met the expectations for each of these roles/identities. The goal here is to be in ‘the zone’. The Zone is that place where inspiration, imagination, creativity, and over all drive and flow come together to make everything you do one of those ‘Yes!’ moments – those moments when you can say that THIS is why you do what you do. Outside of these zones are Learning Zones. These areas are where your skills are being challenged to expand. You are learning new ideas, new concepts, and working harder than normal to meet deadlines. None of us are meant to stay in these Learning Zones forever, but as we conquer new skill sets, our Learning Zones get incorporated into The Zone, creating an ever widening point of job satisfaction. The areas were we don’t want to be is outside the Learning Zones. At the top is the Burned Out Zone – where the stress is so much that we can never hope to cope and we eventually burn out. At the bottom is the Rust Out Zone – where there is no challenge, no joy, and no anticipation of things to come – where skills become rusty with disuse. So the diagram we use looks something like this:
We perform at an optimal level while we are “in the zone”. When we are in one of the learning zones, we are working, but it is more stressful, takes us longer to get the job done – in effect we are trying to expand our “zone” to include the learning zone. Is this where you want to be? What can you do to bring the specific role into the “zone”? It may sound basic, but having this laid out will help you to realize what specific areas of your marketing you to need to work on in order to bring it into alignment with where you want to be. Here at my company our marketing department wears many hats. They are involved with sales, direct marketing, contracts, customer support, and many other areas of company life. Where on the graph do each of these reside? Break the areas out further to help determine specific aspects of each hat. With direct marketing, where are you in regards to social marketing? To more traditional, email and phone marketing? And let’s not forget the all important internal marketing – direct marketing can play a huge role in marketing to a company’s internal customers. Which hat, or aspects of the hat is falling behind? Which are too much to handle at this time until new job skills are learned? By using this exercise we can quickly become aware of whether we are on the road to success, or if we fell off somewhere along the way. So where are you?
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Who says good service is dead?
- Tier service offerings
- Automated voice systems
- Less support personnel per customer
- Less skilled personnel
- Listen to what the customer wants - then do it
- Take care of your internal customers - provide them with adequate pay and training
- Ensure that management does more than pay lip-service to both internal and external customers
There are many theories as to why, with all of the advances made in providing better customer service, so many customers in fact feel that they are receiving less service.
These are but a few of the many theories that abound, and unfortunately they are all true. Not just one or two, but all of the theories combine to make a poor experience for many customers.
There is nothing wrong with a tiered service offering, provided it has been adequately communicated to the customer as to what they are receiving. At this same time, how can a company turn its back on a customer who really has no clue on the next step they should take? By going the little extra mile to assist the customer will direction, superior customer service is rendered.
Whoever came up with the automated voice system should be strung up. No one likes these and supposedly good companies have surprisingly bad systems in place. For example, I have been fighting with Wal-mart for the last 6 weeks over when a mattress I ordered would be delivered. I have had to resort to email communication because I simply can't seem to get a live person on the phone. No matter what number I press, I always receive the same message that their online support will provide me with answers. If you want to win customers, lose the automated voice system, or at least keep it to a bare minimum with very easy escape routes to a live person for those customers that just can't wait.
I know that times are tough, but tough times are also the best times for a company to scoop up a huge market share of customers by providing the extras that the other companies are dropping off their offerings. A company that I work for has been bouncing this issue around for some time now and I keep hoping that they will wake up and realize we need more support personnel. When I started at the company, we had twice as many reps as they do now, and I am pretty sure we had fewer calls. The company did hire someone as a call coordinator, so customers would not have to wait to talk to a person, but unfortunately it is not helping matters. Customers are still not getting their problems resolved in what they consider to be a timely manner. The key here is "what they consider to be a timely manner". If a company wants to win customers, then said company must cater to the customers' needs.
Less skilled personnel - this is perhaps the bane of the entire industry. Why is it that a group of people that are required to know so much, and do so much, are paid so little? In the company that I work for, the support group must know a lot of every job in the company from programming to project manager to sales, but they get paid less than any of them. A company gets what it pays for, and in this case, that tends to be less skilled employees. Even hiring someone with fewer skills and then training them has its cons when pay is not sufficient. A trained employee is no longer unskilled and thus can usually find higher paying job elsewhere that actually requires less work.
Thankfully all of these issues can be resolved by a few basic steps:
Just remember:
Happy employee = happy customer = profits